As a US headquartered company, we transfer personal data from Europe to the US by either storing it in the US or by accessing it from the US to provide support functions in performing some of our Services. As discussed in the Schrems II ruling, there are certain surveillance laws in the US that allow government agencies to access personal data in a manner that could potentially present an obstacle for data exporters seeking to ensure an essentially equivalent standard of protection for personal data. The CJEU focused on two laws in particular, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ("702 FISA") and Executive Order 12333 ("EO 12333"). However, as noted below, none of the Allegis Group Services are subject to FISA 702 and to date we have never received a government request for customer personal data under FISA 702 or knowingly assisted the US government in obtaining bulk data pursuant to EO 12333. Additionally, in the event that the Allegis Group ever received such a request we would publish as much information as legally permitted in an annual Transparency Report.
What transfer tool does Allegis Group rely on to transfer personal data to the US?
Since Privacy Shield is no longer available as a lawful transfer mechanism, Allegis Group currently relies on the New SCCs for transfers of personal data from the EEA and Switzerland to the US and the Old SCCs for transfers from the UK to the US. As noted earlier, the Schrems II ruling confirmed that the SCCs remain a valid transfer mechanism under the GDPR.
What is FISA 702?
In the Schrems II ruling, the CJEU identified two US laws as being potential obstacles to the essentially equivalent standard of protection for personal data. The first, FISA 702, refers to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. § 1881a et seq.), a US surveillance law that authorizes US government agencies to obtain foreign intelligence information to and from non-US persons located outside of the US. Foreign intelligence information is limited to information necessary to protect the US, including intelligence necessary to protect the US against actual or potential attacks, sabotage, international terrorism, or clandestine intelligence activities by a foreign power, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, or information that is necessary to protect the US national defense or the conduct of US foreign affairs. FISA 702 requests are limited to foreign intelligence information coming to or from a targeted individual. The requests cannot include information about a targeted individual.
FISA 702 applies to companies that qualify as an "electronic communication service provider", which is defined as:
(A) a telecommunications carrier, as that term is defined in section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. § 153);
(B) a provider of electronic communication service, as that term is defined in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code;
(C) a provider of a remote computing service, as that term is defined in section 2711 of title 18, United States Code;
(D) any other communication service provider who has access to wire or electronic communications either as such communications are transmitted or as such communications are stored; or
(E) an officer, employee, or agent of an entity described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D).
What did Schrems II say about FISA 702?
In the Schrems II ruling, the CJEU held that FISA 702 does not respect the minimum safeguards resulting from the principle of proportionality under EU law and is therefore a potential obstacle to ensuring an essentially equivalent level of protection for personal data transferred to the US. In the EDPB Recommendations, the EDPB further stated that data exporters must consider whether FISA 702 applies in practice to their particular transfer in order to determine whether supplementary measures are needed.
Are any of Allegis Group’s Services subject to FISA 702?
No, none of the Allegis Group Services are subject to FISA 702. Allegis Group did a thorough analysis of each of our service offerings with the assistance of outside privacy counsel and determined that the Allegis Group does not provide an electronic communication service or remote computing service with respect to any of our service offerings. Allegis Group continues to monitor this as we enhance and expand our service offerings and will update this page if necessary.
What is EO 12333 and is Allegis Group subject to it?
In Schrems II, the CJEU also identified Executive Order 12333 (EO 12333) as a US law that interferes with EU data subject rights. EO 12333 provides authorization for US intelligence agencies to conduct surveillance outside of the US and imposes certain limits, including limits on the amount of time intelligence can be retained and used.
EO 12333 does not on its own authorize the US government to require companies to disclose data. Instead, EO 12333 provides general authorization for surveillance but government authorities must rely on a statute (such as FISA 702) to actually collect data.
It is Allegis Group policy not to provide any voluntary assistance to government agencies that collect information pursuant to EO 12333 and, importantly, EO 12333 does not impose any legal obligations on Allegis Group. To date, Allegis Group has not received any requests for bulk data and does not knowingly assist the US government in obtaining bulk data pursuant to EO 12333.
What is the US Government's position regarding data transfers from Europe to the United States?
After Schrems II, the US Government issued a white paper clarifying that “as a practical matter, for many companies the issues of national security data access that appear to have concerned the [CJEU] in Schrems II are unlikely to arise because the data they handle is of no interest to the US intelligence community.” According to the US Government, “companies that fall in this category have no reason to believe their data transfers present the type of data protection risks that concerned the [CJEU] in Schrems II.”
The white paper further explains that:
- Companies that handle “ordinary commercial information like employee, customer, or sales records, would have no basis to believe US intelligence agencies would seek to collect that data.”
- “The theoretical possibility that a US intelligence agency could unilaterally access data being transferred from the EU without the company’s knowledge is no different than the theoretical possibility that other governments’ intelligence agencies, including those of EU Member States, or a private entity acting illicitly, might access the data.” The white paper adds that such access to data could occur anywhere in the world and not just the US.
While Allegis Group has determined that it is not subject to FISA 702, even if that were to change the white paper also explains that:
- EU citizens, and all individuals, have individual redress for violations of FISA 702 through measures not addressed by the court in the Schrems II ruling, including FISA provisions allowing private actions for compensatory and punitive damages.
- The US government frequently shares intelligence information with EU Member States, including data disclosed by companies in response to FISA 702 orders, to counter threats such as terrorism, weapons proliferation, and hostile foreign cyber activity. The sharing of FISA 702 information undoubtedly serves important EU public interests by protecting the governments and people of the Member States.
There is a wealth of public information about privacy protections in US law concerning government access to data for national security purposes, including information not recorded in the decision on which the CJEU based its conclusions in Schrems II, new developments that have occurred since 2016, and information the CJEU neither considered nor addressed. The white paper states that “companies may wish to take this information into account in any assessment of US law post-Schrems II” and includes references to publicly available resources which our customers may find helpful to review.